Archive for the ‘VPN service’ Category

Discount up to 60% on VPN services from CactusVPN

February 9th, 2012 by admin | No Comments | Filed in hide ip, VPN service

We’ve found an interesting offer and want to share it with our readers. A new VPN provider is launched and has a very good discount.

You can save up to 60% for VPN services from CactusVPN. What do you have to do to obtain this discount? Nothing else but to buy a premium VPN service using the code from the banner on their front page! The trick is: the earlier you buy the bigger is the save. The discount is the biggest at the beginning of the promotion and drops down by 10% every day. We’ve find out about this just today so maximum discount is 60%, but this is still big so don’t hesitate if you need a VPN provider and buy today.

YouTube Wants to Rival TV

April 11th, 2011 by vitalie | No Comments | Filed in Browsing, hide ip, Internet, VPN service

Google is dropping $100 million to add original programming to YouTube that will be featured on “channels,” reports the Wall Street Journal. YouTube aims to rival broadcast and cable TV in the hopes of attracting more viewers and advertisers. YouTube will add about 20 channels themed around topics like arts and sports. The overhaul comes at a time when more people watch TV shows on the internet, and the company is under increasing pressure to turn a profit. “YouTube executives say they want people to ‘watch YouTube’ the same way they ‘watch TV,’” with new services beginning before the end of the year, writes the WSJ.

 

Due to copyright,  some of the content might be blocked for non-US users. You might consider subscribing to a VPN service  that will change your IP address and give you instant access.

 

All in all, we’re looking forward to see how everything will develop.

Skype – a security risk ?

March 29th, 2011 by vitalie | No Comments | Filed in hide ip, VPN service

According to the NYTimes and Slashdot, there are reports of China stepping up electronic communications censorship beyond e-mail and the Internet in the form of “policing cellphone calls” such as if “antigovernment sentiment” words are spoken. Two callers, one speaking English and the other Chinese, have reported being cut off mid-sentence after saying “protest.”

Perhaps NSA didn’t cut people off mid-sentence, but it intercepted electronic communications and, with help from AT&T, engaged in warrantless surveillance of Americans during the Bush administration. The ACLU recently declared a victory when a federal appeals court revived a lawsuit challenging NSA surveillance and the constitutionality of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) [PDF]. The Bush wiretapping law gave the government the power to electronically snoop on Americans’ international communications without needing a probable cause warrant – if an American was communicating with someone outside of the United States.

These days for electronic communication and placing international calls, many people use the free Voice-over-IP (VoIP) provider Skypeto talk, transfer files and video chat. While the majority of users love Skype, there have been concerns in the past about if Skype had a back door for eavesdropping. In 2008, Skype downplayed “a report revealed that its Chinese service not only monitors text chats with sensitive keywords, which it had earlier admitted, but also stores them along with millions of personal user records on computers that could easily be accessed by anybody.” Then Heise Security reported on a back door built into Skype which might allow “connections to be bugged.” Australian police had claimed they were “able to listen in on Skype connections.”

While international long-distance calling slumped in this current economy, TeleGeography reportedthat Skype-to-Skype international calls soared, making up 12% of all long-distance calls. Because so many people depend upon Skype, Privacy International (PI) recently asked Skype to improve the security of its VoIP service to protect users’ privacy – especially those in oppressive regimes which could have their lives endangered. PI believes Skype users are vulnerable to interception, impersonation and surveillance. Specific complaints included that it’s easy to impersonate users, poor audio encoding could allow eavesdropping, and the lack of HTTPS for Skype download service which could be spoofed so users download compromised versions of Skype like what happened previously in China.

PI mentioned a research paper called Spot me if you can: Uncovering spoken phrases in encrypted VoIP conversations [PDF]. Researchers wrote “We evaluate our techniques on a standard speech recognition corpus containing over 2,000 phonetically rich phrases spoken by 630 distinct speakers from across the continental United States. Our results indicate that we can identify phrases within encrypted calls with an average accuracy of 50%, and with accuracy greater than 90% for some phrases. Clearly, such an attack calls into question the efficacy of current VoIP encryption standards.”

Yet during a Risky Business podcast, Paul Ducklin of Sophos Naked Security took issue with PI’s criticism of Skype security. “Paul called this out as a desperate attempt on PI’s part to get press and was a voice of reason about the real risks to activists and dissidents that might be present when using Skype.” Ducklin said even if  Skype used HTTPS for downloads, it would not prevent trojanized versions of Skype if a country like China issued its own SSL certification. In fact, the podcast went so far as to call it “worse than a bucket of fail” and suggested PI educate dissidents how to use safely download and use Skype.

But Privacy International’s Human Rights and Technology Advisor, Eric King, says: “Skype’s misleading security assurances continue to expose users around the world to unnecessary and dangerous risk. It’s time for Skype to own up to the reality of its security and to take a leadership position in global communications.”

At the time of PI’s security concerns about Skype, a spokesman for Skype said: “Privacy International has not been in touch with us so it will take us some time to read and digest the report before we are in a position to respond. We will look into the points they have raised and will reach out to them. Skype takes these issues seriously and aims to provide users with the best possible levels of privacy and security.”

When asked if Skype has responded since then, PI’s King said, “Julie Petrini, Vice President & General Counsel, Operations, who is privacy lead for Skype has been in touch with us and wants to talk. We’re hoping for a phone conference next week.”

Meanwhile, Skype was one of the sites targeted with fraudulent digital SSL certificates in a malicious attack which appears to have come from the Iranian government. The digital certificates impersonated Skype, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft’s Live, and other websites.

That means that you need to make sure you’re safe and able to talk freely with your dear ones. Use a VPN service to hide your IP address and minimize the risk of being exposed. Make sure they provide  a tutorial for making the VPN connection on Skype application also.

 

Your IP is your ID.

 

P2P/Torrent traffic while using VPN

March 29th, 2011 by vitalie | No Comments | Filed in Internet, VPN service

Most VPN providers have a disclaimer or clause in their TOS which excludes the use of their services for P2P traffic of an any nature (illegal or not). Many VPN servers got suspended lately by hosting providers due to DMCA complaints, so VPN providers are very careful when it comes to P2P/torrent traffic.

 

Here is a list of several VPN services that allow P2p/Torrent traffic.

VPN Provider Countries Price Bandwidth
Ace VPN Netherlands and Germany $15/month Unlimited
Anonyproz USA, UK, Malaysia. $10/month Unlimited
AnonymityNetwork USA, Canada, Netherlands, Germany $25.8/month 120 GB
BolehVPN United States, UK, Canada, Luxembourg, Netherlands, and Sweden $10/month Unlimited
ConnectionVPN USA, Luxembourg 15 EUR/

3 months

Unlimited
CyberGhost VPN Germany 1GB free/ 40GB – 9.99 EUR 40 GB
Darknet VPN Germany 5 EUR/month Unlimited
HideIpVPN Germany, Netherlands $7.95/month Unlimited
HideMyAss USA, Canada, Germany, UK, Netherlands, Russia, Estonia, Ukraine, Hungary, Portugal, Sweeden from $11.52/month Unlimited
ItsHidden Netherlands free Unlimited
TorrentFreedom Netherlands $17/month Unlimited
TuVPN USA 12 Euro/month Unlimited

{ via How-to-Hide-IP }

China dismisses allegations over obstruction of Google’s Gmail service

March 29th, 2011 by vitalie | No Comments | Filed in Browsing, hide ip, Internet, VPN service

China has dismissed Google’s allegation that Beijing is hampering access to its email service as “unacceptable”. The internet provider said it believed government blocks were responsible for technical problems using Gmail from China.

The problems arose amid a tightening of internet controls that has made it increasingly difficult to use several popular virtual private networks. VPNs allow people to access material hosted overseas even if it is blocked by the Chinese government.

The new restrictions appear to be part of a security clampdown sparked by anonymous online calls for a “jasmine revolution” akin to the recent uprisings in the Middle East. Those messages were posted on an overseas website, but scores of Chinese activists and dissidents have been questioned, harassed and in some cases detained by the authorities for weeks.

A Google spokesman told the Guardian this week: “Relating to Google, there is no [technical] issue on our side. We have checked extensively. This is a government blockage carefully designed to look like the problem is with Gmail.”

Users have reported frequent problems with basic tasks such as sending and searching emails or opening their address books.

But Jiang Yu, a spokeswoman for the foreign ministry, told a regular news conference: “This is an unacceptable accusation.” She declined to comment further. The ministry of commerce and ministry of industry and information technology did not respond to faxed questions.

This month WiTopia, one of the most popular VPNs, asked users to report problems via email rather than its live support service because of an “extraordinary volume [of issues] from China shenanigans“. The architect of the online censorship system had previously said it was“lagging behind” in a battle against VPNs and that further tightening was needed.

“It’s grim. The reality is they can shut off all access if they want to,” said Bill Bishop, a Beijing-based internet specialist.

He added: “You are heading into a two-internet world.”

One Beijing-based industry source – who, like many, did not want to be identified in connection with the subject – said he hoped controls might ease in time. He pointed out that in the past sites such as Wikipedia had become available after having been blocked for years and suggested that blocks might be a temporary measure to encourage Chinese users to switch to local alternatives.

Many users are largely oblivious to the tightening of restrictions, preferring to use domestic email and social media services. But a growing number of activists and dissidents have embraced services such as Twitter, which is blocked and available only with the use of a VPN or other censorship-evasion technology.

Richard Buangan, spokesman for the US embassy in Beijing, said: “As part of our ongoing dialogue with China, we have emphasised to the Chinese government our view on the importance of an open internet. The ability to operate with confidence in cyberspace is critical in a modern society and economy.

“The United States believes that freedom of expression, including on the internet, is a universal right that should be available to all people, whether they are in the United States, China or any other nation.”

Google angered the Chinese government when it announced last year that it was no longer willing to censor search results in the country andmoved its Chinese search service to Hong Kong. It cited increased censorship and a cyberattack which it said appeared to have targeted human rights activists.

Separately, Google reported this month that it had seen “some highly targeted and apparently politically motivated attacks against our users”, exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser. It did not identify the subjects, but journalists in China reported suspicious messages from users such as “moli hua” – Chinese for “jasmine” – at the same time.

Greg Walton, of cyber intelligence company MetaLab Asia, who analysed those messages, said users were invited to click on links that led to malware hosted on a Hong Kong server. It was apparently designed to download Gmail cookies and email them to several addresses, enabling access to the targets’ Gmail accounts. One piece of malware appears to have been designed to connect the target computer to a command and control server in Heilongjiang, northern China.

Chinese officials have repeatedly said their laws ban hacking and that the country is itself a victim of cyber-attacks.

Still not all VPN services have been affected by the issue and you can very well use VPN to ensure your anonymity while in China. Since PPTP and L2TP connection types have been blocked lately, the best choice is services that provide OpenVPN connection type.

{ via The Guardian }

A New Internet Privacy Law ?

March 21st, 2011 by vitalie | No Comments | Filed in Browsing, hide ip, VPN service

Considering how much information we entrust to the Internet every day, it is hard to believe there is no general law to protect people’s privacy online. Companies harvest data about people as they surf the Net, assemble it into detailed profiles and sell it to advertisers or others without ever asking permission.

So it is good to see a groundswell of support emerging for minimum standards of privacy, online and off. This week, the Obama administration called for legislation to protect consumers’ privacy. In the Senate, John Kerry is trying to draft a privacy bill of rights with the across-the-aisle support of John McCain.

Microsoft, which runs one of the biggest Internet advertising networks, said it supports a broad-based privacy law. It has just introduced a version of its Explorer browser that allows surfers to block some tools advertisers use to track consumers’ activities online.

It is crucial that lawmakers get this right. There is strong pressure from the advertising industry to water down rules aimed at limiting the data companies can collect and what they can do with it.

Most oppose a sensible proposal by the Federal Trade Commission for a do-not-track option — likely embedded in Web browsers. They have proposed self-regulation instead, and we applaud their desire to do that, but the zeal to self-regulate tends to wane when it is not backed by government rules and enforcement.

Senator Kerry has not yet proposed specific legislation, but he has laid out sound principles. Companies that track people’s activities online must obtain people’s consent first. They must specify what data they are collecting and how they will use it. They need consumers’ go-ahead to use data for any new purpose. They are responsible for the data’s integrity. And consumers should have the right to sever their relationship with data collectors and ask for their file to be deleted.

But there are potential areas of concern. Senator Kerry so far has not called for a do-not-track option. He would allow companies to write their own privacy plans and submit them to the F.T.C. for approval.

That would give companies flexibility to adapt their solutions as technology evolved, but it lacks the simplicity and universality of a do-not-track feature. It could yield a dizzying array of solutions that would confuse consumers about their rights and options and make it more difficult to enforce clear standards. Moreover, it would make it tougher for consumers to keep track of how their information is used and to whom it is sold.

Advertising firms still argue that privacy protections could undermine the free Internet, depriving it of ad revenue by reducing advertisers’ ability to target consumers. This is overstated. Advertisers will still need to advertise. If many people opt out of behavioral targeting, the firms will find other ways to do it. Why not keeping your online life anonymous ? You can use a VPN service and protect  your ID on the Web.

Privacy protections are long overdue. We hope the swell of support will lead to significant legislation.

source :  The New York Times

 

Great Firewall of China

March 20th, 2011 by vitalie | No Comments | Filed in hide ip, Internet, VPN service

If you’ve been struggling to get your dose of Facebook or Twitter in China recently, then you’re probably one of the many Internet users who’ve had their VPN access — either free or paid for — blocked over the last two weeks or so. That’s right, the notorious Great Firewall of China is still alive and well, and leaving proxy servers aside, VPN is pretty much the only way for keen netizens to access websites that are deemed too sensitive for their eyes; or to “leap over the wall,” as they say. Alas, the recent pro-democracy protests didn’t exactly do these guys any favor — for one, their organizers used Twitter along with an overseas human rights website to gather protesters, and with the National People’s Congress meetings that were about to take place (and wrapped up last night), it was no surprise that the government went tough on this little bypassing trick. To make matters worse, PC World is reporting that Gmail users are also affected by slow or limited access, despite the service previously being free from China’s blacklist.

We reached out to a handful of major VPN service providers, and they all confirmed a significant increase in the amount of blockage — possibly by having their servers’ PPTP IP addresses blocked — over the last two weeks. One company even spotted the Chinese government subscribing to its paid service, only to work its way into the network to locate the company’s PPTP server list, and then put them behind the firewall. Fortunately for some, the better-off companies had backup servers to rapidly resolve the problem, whereas the cheaper and free services were unable to dodge the bullet.  Other companies provide a 256 bit encryption connection type  which is much safer and secure , i’m talking about OpenVPN connection type. This just goes to show that sometimes you get what you pay for ( see our previous post regarding top 5 vpn services ). That said, with practically unlimited human hacking power at its disposal, it doesn’t take much for the firewall to shut down everything heading its way. For the sake of our friends and expats there, let’s just hope that the government will take things down a notch as soon as the storm calms.